麻豆官网

As crews work to remove what was, the city is still trying to figure out what should go up in its place. In July, a consultant for the city released a report on public opinion about the site showing the most popular use was another hotel, possibly with some ground-floor retail or restaurant space.

But there was also support for other uses like a movie theater, grocery store, affordable housing, a food hall or a conference center. City officials say they鈥檝e already received inquiries about the site, particularly to build a new hotel. But the City Council will ultimately need to decide how it wants to proceed.

The council discussed several options over the summer. The city can simply sell the lot with a litany of deed requirements dictating the site鈥檚 future use. The city could also elect to serve as the developer itself and lease whatever the council decides to build out to a tenant. Finally, the city could issue a request for proposals for a ground lease deal that would see the city maintain ownership of the underlying property.

City officials think a straight sale of the property wouldn鈥檛 return an initial profit on the $5.75 million spent to acquire the lot. But Economic Development Director Patrick Small told the council back in July that the return would ultimately come in increased tax revenues from whatever is built on the site.

Prince said the council has yet to decide how it will proceed with the site, which will remain inaccessible to the public until it鈥檚 finally developed.