The following information is provided by Graphiq and PrettyFamous.
By Ben Taylor

If you want to know about Hollywood peaks, just ask . After annihilating terrorists as Officer John McClane in â,â Willis exploded into outer space with Michael Bayâs 1998 smash hit, â.â
A year later, he became a therapist, pivoting to a softer, more nuanced role in M. Night Shyamalanâs â.â Not only could Willis light up a room of goons â he could captivate the world from the side of a hospital bed. No matter what the subject, Willis had become a box office guarantee.
Or had he?
Since 1999, Willis has hit a box office slump. Here and there, his films have crossed the $100 million mark, but largely on the strength of reboots and get-the-band-back-together gimmicks (see âLive Free or Die Hardâ and âThe Expendablesâ). His biggest box office success since Haley Joel Osment ? âOver the Hedge,â a 2006 DreamWorks animation feature, where Willis did voice work for RJ the Raccoon.
Bruce Willis isnât alone. , a celebrity and entertainment data site thatâs part of the network, set out to find the actors with the biggest career declines, using box office proceeds as a measurement for success.
Ranking Hollywoodâs biggest decliners is tricky. Some actors fade gradually. Others fall fast, then recover. Still others decline in a roller coaster of alternating hits and flops.
In the end, the PrettyFamous team used the following factors to rank Hollywoodâs biggest falls from box office grace. Most of the data comes from , with some supplementary numbers from (all figures are domestic and adjusted for inflation):
- Only actors whose movies have grossed a combined $2 billion were considered
- The actor had to have at least 10 film credits both before and after the “peak” film (the actor’s most lucrative movie)
- The actorâs post-peak movies had to average less than half the box office gross of all the pre-peak movies
- No post-peak film could exceed $200 million or 75 percent of the peak filmâs gross
The resulting decliners enjoyed frequent box office success, followed by frequent box office disappointment. The final list is ranked by the difference between average box office proceeds for all films before and after the actor’s peak.
The 10 Biggest Decliners
- Ving Rhames
- Robert De Niro
- Dennis Quaid
- Keanu Reeves
- Matthew Broderick
- Bruce Willis
- Cuba Gooding Jr.
- Bill Pullman
- Sigourney Weaver
- David Thewlis
Note that the list is based on the money, not the individual performances. The methodology doesnât factor in critic reviews or awards, and thereâs no adjustment for the prominence of each actorâs specific role. Additionally, comprehensive box office data is limited or incomplete for some movies, particularly those made before 1985. Our coverage is close to comprehensive after that year, but we excluded actors who peaked before then, due to a lack of reliable data.
Still, thereâs enough data here to suggest the 10 stars on the list have passed their primes. What happened?
The Textbook Cases
Bill Pullman: recent movies make $60 million less than earlier movies
Cuba Gooding Jr.: recent movies make $54 million less than earlier movies
Dennis Quaid: recent movies make $15 million less than earlier movies
Bill Pullman made a name for himself playing the boyfriends and husbands of female stars, from Earl Mott (“Ruthless Peopleâ) to Bob Hinson (âA League of Their Ownâ) to Walter (âSleepless in Seattleâ). His patience paid off with âIndependence Day,â where he won his biggest role yet in President Thomas J. Whitmore â second only to Will Smith on the movie poster. The film made almost $500 million domestically.
But that would just about do it for Pullman, whose films would surpass the $50 million mark only two more times throughout the rest of his career. ±őłÙâs possible that Pullman simply cares less about box office glory than the average actor, content to in his spare time. For a man who gravitates towards smaller, supporting roles, itâs oddly fitting that he had an uncharacteristic high point playing the highest office in America.
Goodingâs decline â both in the box office and among critics â well in the . With âA Few Good Men,â âJerry Maguire,â âAs Good As It Gets,â and most lucratively, âPearl Harbor,â Gooding looked poised to become the next Tom Hanks or Will Smith.
Then the flops began. First, there was âSnow Dogs.â Then âRadio.â Then âDaddy Day Camp.â Some did okay in the box office. All were . Gooding was nominated four times for âWorst Actorâ by the infamous . Unable to break out of his spiral, Gooding settled for a dozen from 2008 through 2013.
The box office success of âSnow Dogsâ ($107 million in 2016 dollars) might have paradoxically hurt Goodingâs career, potentially branding him as a goofy B-movie performer, rather than a serious leading man.
The silver lining? Gooding has made a small resurgence over the last three years. He can proudly add âLee Danielsâ The Butlerâ and âSelmaâ to his rĂ©sumĂ©, while his recent TV series, âThe People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story,â has gotten rave reviews.
Americaâs favorite film father (see âFrequency,â âThe Parent Trap,â âThe Day After Tomorrowâ), Dennis Quaid saw his box office stock rise steadily from 1987 through 2004. After a series of modest hits throughout the â90s, Quaid kickstarted his career prime with âThe Parent Trap,â playing the well-intentioned dad who just happens to fall in love with the wrong woman.
He quickly became quarterback Jack âCapâ Rooney in the classic football movie, âAny Given Sundayâ (1999), then tacked on a supporting role in the 2000 hit, âTraffic.â By the time he was cast as Jake Gyllenhaalâs co-star in the controversial âDay After Tomorrow,â Quaid was as bankable as a cashierâs check.
So what happened? Quaid likely wasnât super hero or action film material (with the possible exception of âG.I. Joe: Rise of the Cobra”). He kept up the dad shtick (2004âs âIn Good Companyâ) and doubled down on the romantic comedy (2012âs âWhat to Expect When Youâre Expectingâ and âPlaying for Keepsâ), but none of these roles would capture the worldâs attention like Lindsay Lohanâs befuddled father or Americaâs favorite veteran quarterback.
The Blockbuster Series Stars
David Thewlis: recent movies make $74 million less than earlier movies
Keanu Reeves: recent movies make $23 million less than earlier movies
Ving Rhames: recent movies make $9.4 million less than earlier movies
David Thewlis is a special case. As Remus Lupin (the quirky professor and part-time werewolf from the Harry Potter series), Thewlis enjoyed consistent box office success from 2004 to 2011. Since then, heâs starred in a string of lower-profile roles â from an impatient landlord (âWar Horseâ) to a cheerful mentor (ââ).
The box office tends to favor some film genres more than others, such as action and fantasy. As older stars gravitate from dynamite to dialogue, from dragons to discourse, they tend to see a drop in box office proceeds, through no fault of their own.
For Thewlis â like many of his Potter co-stars â youâd be better off calling his box office decline a return to reality rather than a fall from grace.
±őłÙâs that Keanu Reeves is a bad actor, but give the man credit for âThe Matrixâ (1999), where the actorâs subdued, near-expressionless dialogue perfectly matched the role.
Reeves peaked with the Wachowski siblingsâ âThe Matrix: Reloadedâ (2003), right around the time the viewing public started to have second thoughts about the Wachowskisâ creative genius. By the time âThe Matrix: Revolutionsâ (2003) notched a , both the series and Reeves were clearly past their primes.
Without his Matrix success, perhaps Reeves would have landed more supporting roles in hit films (see his slacker boyfriend portrayal in the 1989 classic, âParenthoodâ). Instead, Reeves had established himself as a leading man, and his hodgepodge of starring roles have only gotten worse â box office-wise, at least â since the turn of the millennium.
Sub out âHarry Potterâ or âThe Matrixâ for âMission: Impossible,â and you can say much of the same for Ving Rhames, who played computer hacker Luther Stickell in all five Mission: Impossible films (his role was uncredited in âGhost Protocolâ). Of his 10 films to surpass $100 million, half come from the Tom Cruise action series.
But to equate Rhames with Thewlis or Reeves wouldnât quite be fair. Rhamesâ non-Mission: Impossible hits include âPulp Fictionâ (1994), âCon Airâ (1997) and âEntrapmentâ (1999). And thatâs not to mention key supporting roles in both “Lilo & Stitch” (2002) and âI Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larryâ (2007), each of which earned well over $100 million.
Rhames has been just quiet enough over the last 10 years to earn a spot on this list, but so long as the Mission: Impossible bullet train keeps running along, heâll have plenty of opportunity for a box office resurgence.
The Late-Career Blockbuster
Sigourney Weaver: recent movies make $73 million less than earlier movies
Were it not for James Cameronâs âAvatarâ â as of this writing, â Sigourney Weaverâs box office history would look much like other top female action stars. Weaver became a bonafide action heroine as the star of the Aliens franchise, then crushed the box office as the leading woman in the Ghostbuster films. Since that time, sheâs had fewer and fewer prominent roles in hit movies, with the exceptions (âThe Village,â âWALL-Eâ) dwarfed by the rule (âTadpole,â âCedar Rapids,â âChappieâ).
Weaverâs journey is a for women in Hollywood: more high-profile roles in their 20s and 30s, with fewer opportunities as they get older.
But Weaverâs portrayal of Dr. Grace Augustine in âAvatarâ marks a dramatic uptick for the Manhattan-born actress. Director James Cameron â who also directed âAliensâ â brought back Weaver for his 2009 smash hit, which speaks to the power of ongoing director-actor collaboration. While Weaver hasnât struck box office gold since âAvatar,â sheâs slated to appear in âAvatar 2â (2018). In other words, Weaver looks poised to exit this list, stage right.
The Aging Veterans
Bruce Willis: recent movies make $46 million less than earlier movies
Robert De Niro: recent movies make $11 million less than earlier movies
Robert De Niro and Bruce Willis remain semi-bankable â theyâre simply no longer the megastars they once were. For these two, their late-career box office results only look modest in the context of their early box office dominance.
Consider De Niro. From 1986 through 2008, he was averaging nearly two $50 million films per year (adjusted for inflation). Several cracked $150 million. He made âAnalyze Thisâ his gold standard in 1999, only to top it one year later with âMeet the Parents.â By 2004, he was as bankable as Leonardo DiCaprio (see âMeet the Fockersâ).
His pace has since slowed to human-like levels, with âSilver Linings Playbookâ and âAmerican Hustleâ his only bonafide, post-Focker hits (and thatâs not to mention the boost each film likely received from co-stars Jennifer Lawrence and Bradley Cooper).
Still, thereâs no shame in a veteran superstar teaming up with fresher talent for late-career success. Just ask Peyton Manning.
Ferris Bueller or Voice Actor?
Matthew Broderick: recent movies make $45 million less than earlier movies
While Matthew Broderickâs first genuine hit was âWarGamesâ (1983), he will always be known as Ferris Bueller, the cheeky, rebellious star of 1986âs âFerris Buellerâs Day Off.â
By the box office, however, âBuellerâ is only Broderickâs sixth most lucrative film, falling behind âGodzilla,â âInspector Gadget,â âWarGames,â âTower Heist,â and most notably, âThe Lion King.â
In fact, âThe Lion Kingâ might serve as a good lesson for Broderick, whose Adult Simba voice helped earn Disney more than $600 million. Since the turn of the millennium, only five Broderick films have earned more than $45 million â and three of those five featured only Broderickâs voice (âGood Boy!â âBee Movie,â âThe Tale of Despereauxâ). Put simply, heâd be perfect in â.â